Simply what the title says. The overview in query is here.
Felt prefer it was related information after the large media circus round Citizen Kane shedding the mantle just a few weeks in the past.
This is a snippet from the overview
I reviewed Paddington 2 negatively for BBC radio on launch in 2017, and on a number of events after that, and I stand by each phrase of my criticism. This isn’t my Paddington Bear, however a sinister, malevolent imposter who needs to be shot into area, or nuked from area at the primary alternative. Over-confident, snide and sullen, this manky-looking bear bears little relation to the basic character, and viewers needs to be warned; this ain’t yo mamma’s Paddington bear, and it received’t be yours both. Possibly if you happen to’ve by no means seen the television present and don’t know any higher, this’ll work, however long-term Paddington followers will discover this an excessive amount of to bear.
Does this sound ridiculous to anybody else? I imply he is entitled to his opinion but it surely appears like a contrarian response with it being added simply weeks after the aforementioned information. Ideas?